Reviewing process

  1. Each article sent to the Quarterly Journal Fides et Ratio is subject to the assessment of the Editor-in-Chief and the FeR Editorial Board for consistency with the profile of the Journal and the current topic of the issue.
  2. Articles are checked with the ISA anti-plagiarism system.
  3. After a positive opinion has been given by the Editor-in-Chief and the Quarterly’s Editorial Board, the publication is forwarded to external reviewers who are experts in a given discipline.
  4. The reviewers have at their disposal a ready-made form, in which they include their remarks, commentaries and evaluation of the publication, and formulate a proposal concerning the conditions of accepting or declining the article for publication (without correction, with correction but no new review required, with correction but a new review required).
  5. The authors and reviewers do not know their identities (“double-blind review process”).
  6. The reviews are forwarded to the author of the article with the request to respond to the remarks and to correct the text as recommended.
  7. The articles will be published if they receive two positive opinions requiring no correction; in the case of negative reviews, the publication will be declined, and the author will be informed of the reasons for this decision.